Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus 6010, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the 6010 (12MP) is very similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and 6010 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-100 was brought out 4 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up versus the 6010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus 6010
| EX-100 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Casio EX-100
| 6010 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus 6010
| EX-100 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 has exterior dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus 6010 has measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus 6010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 compared to the 6010.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and 6010 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and 6010.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixels but different sensor measurements. The EX-100 has got the larger sensor which will make getting bokeh less difficult. The more recent EX-100 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $572 | $0 |