Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TG-810 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-100 was introduced 2 years later than the TG-810 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-100 scores against the TG-810 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-100 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 31 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-100
| TG-810 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-100 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 offers physical dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-810 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-100 and the TG-810.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and TG-810 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and TG-810.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-810 will give more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | 220 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $572 | $428 |