Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-100 was launched 2 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-100 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-100 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-100
| TG-820 iHS | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 922k | Crisper screen (+108k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-100 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has got exterior dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 against the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and TG-820 iHS is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The EX-100 comes with the bigger sensor which should make achieving bokeh easier. The more recent EX-100 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-100 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
offers face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-100 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
small sensor size (1/1.7")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Casio EX-100 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
maximum shutter speed is high (1/20,000 seconds)
max fps high (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery power (390 per charge)
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-100 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography factors
great battery power (390 shots)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
environment proofing
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-100 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-100
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $572 | $500 |