Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-100 was unveiled 22 months after the TG-1 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-100 matches up vs the TG-1 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
EX-100 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 22 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer screen (+312k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-100
TG-1 iHS | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
EX-100 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 enjoys exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-100 versus the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/971f5/971f57f6e21f1e4ac9403f8f0d9768760f3ceca8" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and TG-1 iHS is 83 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d95a1/d95a1c92987e3bf02b90ea113c1e9af0c97f8caf" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The picture below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The EX-100 offers the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer EX-100 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96459/96459368c94baced767a8b5a21038a6b0a1bc1a0" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d014/6d01422671ce163cfe82b887a1b0e9e9dd42ec98" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 350 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $572 | $399 |