Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and VR-320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-100 was brought out 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-100 grades vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus VR-320
EX-100 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 32 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-100
VR-320 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus VR-320
EX-100 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 comes with exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-100 vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/356b2/356b2142b9c823b21f07a6394d056bb077de4f19" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and VR-320 is 83 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da593/da5931e1e178caa71e0ab266e76d0cde8bac3d88" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and VR-320.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will give greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-100 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cb88/3cb882542fa7ee257797e571508f272fd866e22c" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7283/f7283fb6c26978b84f872e7b0946a065a4f38bbd" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-02-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $572 | $179 |