Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and CX1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-100 was introduced 5 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 scores versus the CX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh CX1
EX-100 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-100
CX1 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX1
EX-100 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 has external dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the CX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and CX1 is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Casio EX-100 will offer you extra detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $572 | $299 |