Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS30
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the FH20 (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Tough-3000 was revealed within a month of the FH20 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Tough-3000 scores against the FH20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Panasonic FH20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic FH20
| Tough-3000 | FH20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| FH20 | Tough-3000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic FH20
| Tough-3000 | FH20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FH20 has measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the FH20.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and FH20 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and FH20.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic FH20 to offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FH20 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | Lumix DMC-FS30 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 178 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $179 |