Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and CX3 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-100 was revealed 3 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-100 scores versus the CX3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-100 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-100
| CX3 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-100 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has got exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 vs the CX3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and CX3 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and CX3.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Casio EX-100 will offer you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $572 | $329 |
