Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh GR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and GR II (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-100 was announced 16 months prior to the GR II which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 matches up vs the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh GR II. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh GR II
EX-100 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Casio EX-100
GR II | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | Fresher by 16 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GR II
EX-100 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 features external dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 and the GR II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffdbc/ffdbcf04930592371274eb4a60107e30b4decd0c" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and GR II is 83 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50881/508811e206ac0ae203925169c88cc736f851868a" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and GR II.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh GR II will show greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f20e3/f20e3a5246a94d198abb261229c295de257f706e" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbe78/bbe78d8e5c3dcd5469cb86375a5d85f91ff352b5" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-06 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 320 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $572 | $599 |