Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-50 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-100 was brought out 4 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-100 grades vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-100
| WG-50 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | February 2014 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 comes with external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-100 vs the WG-50.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and WG-50 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and WG-50.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-50 will give you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | 300 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $572 | $280 |