Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-50 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-100 was brought out 4 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-100 grades vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-100
| WG-50 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | February 2014 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 comes with external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-100 vs the WG-50.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and WG-50 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and WG-50.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-50 will give you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | 300 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $572 | $280 |