Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was launched 7 months before the WG-M1 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-100 grades versus the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+2") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-100
| WG-M1 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 features outside dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-100 versus the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and WG-M1 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged EX-100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $572 | $2,000 |