Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was released 18 months later than the Galaxy Camera 3G which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-100 grades versus the Galaxy Camera 3G in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-100 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | August 2012 | More recent by 18 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 0k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-100
Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 4.8" | 3.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-100 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 offers outer dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-100 against the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-100 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-02-06 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $572 | $606 |