Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-100 was launched 3 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-100 scores vs the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Sharper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-100
| HZ35W | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has got exterior dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and HZ35W is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The EX-100 uses the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The fresher EX-100 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $572 | $300 |