Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-100 versus Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is very well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and HZ50W (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-100 was brought out 3 years after the HZ50W which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-100 scores versus the HZ50W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung HZ50W
EX-100 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | May 2010 | Newer by 46 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Casio EX-100
HZ50W | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung HZ50W
EX-100 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 enjoys outer dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 versus Samsung HZ50W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 compared to the HZ50W.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and HZ50W is 83 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and HZ50W.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will give you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer EX-100 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung HZ50W |
Alternative name | - | WB5500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $572 | $250 |