Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-100 was launched 5 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-100 scores against the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-100
| SL102 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL102
| EX-100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 features physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-100 vs the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and SL102 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and SL102.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-100 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern EX-100 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $572 | $130 |
