Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-100 was unveiled 5 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-100 grades versus the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung SL202
EX-100 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-100
SL202 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL202
EX-100 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 enjoys outer measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 vs the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and SL202 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and SL202.
All in all, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Casio EX-100 will give extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-100 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL202 |
Also Known as | - | PL50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $572 | $140 |