Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as ES15
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is fairly similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SL30 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-100 was revealed 5 years later than the SL30 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-100 matches up vs the SL30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung SL30. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung SL30
| EX-100 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-100
| SL30 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL30
| EX-100 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 has got external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has specifications of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the SL30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and SL30 is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The photograph here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and SL30.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Casio EX-100 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also called as | - | ES15 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | $93 |