Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SH-1 (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-1 was launched 4 years after the ZR1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SH-1 grades versus the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Panasonic ZR1
SH-1 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 57 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus SH-1
ZR1 | SH-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Panasonic ZR1
SH-1 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SH-1 and the ZR1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SH-1 and ZR1 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-1 and ZR1.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-1 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer SH-1 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.10 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $349 | $280 |