Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b34/d2b34be0402f7c9fe3c7c9ed4462bc8843f628b6" alt="Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and ST150F (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-100 was launched 14 months later than the ST150F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up against the ST150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung ST150F
EX-100 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-100
ST150F | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung ST150F
EX-100 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 offers outside dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-100 against the ST150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd07/ccd079ee94da27d790e100a015fd8cd28b88d51e" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and ST150F is 83 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cc6/a9cc6bc86b2ab88bce10216f6a688d3e8bd64a7e" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and ST150F.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung ST150F will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger EX-100 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5822/d582245a3ded9111cf6f2cf48297138b42cf1934" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5273b/5273bd835ca7ee009d63c9867d0228f45ad39b0a" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST150F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 114 gr (0.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $572 | $300 |