Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced April 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and ST93 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was launched 2 years later than the ST93 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-100 scores vs the ST93 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung ST93. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung ST93
| EX-100 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | April 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-100
| ST93 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung ST93
| EX-100 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 enjoys external dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 versus the ST93.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and ST93 is 83 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and ST93.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST93 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST93 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2011-04-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 pounds) | 110 gr (0.24 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | - |