Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47


99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and ST95 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

The EX-100 was manufactured 3 years later than the ST95 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-100 grades against the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung ST95
EX-100 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 38 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-100
ST95 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung ST95
EX-100 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 has exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 and Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-100 against the ST95.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and ST95 is 83 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and ST95.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung ST95 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung ST95 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | - |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $572 | $145 |