Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c3/8d6c3208a98a04c133c77814dcb12d444671965b" alt="Samsung TL240 front Samsung TL240 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TL240 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-100 was manufactured 4 years later than the TL240 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-100 scores vs the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung TL240
EX-100 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-100
TL240 | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL240
EX-100 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.5" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-100 and the TL240.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea9f/bea9f80b7f1c5706a022cdecdc89ffd11a2b3ea6" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and TL240 is 83 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df2b/3df2b9f80f41a797a822a68f512f27e55b9aa441" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The photograph here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and TL240.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung TL240 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4af0a/4af0a8352e4c9749823dd331fff791bdc55af9d1" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6fa0/e6fa0c1ce96b5af1a6e785e0508e2cd1f9c2fdaa" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL240 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $572 | $171 |