Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-100 was brought out 5 years after the TL320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 grades versus the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-100 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-100
| TL320 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL320
| EX-100 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 provides physical dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 compared to the TL320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and TL320 is 83 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and TL320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The EX-100 uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The fresher EX-100 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $572 | $380 |