Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-100 was brought out 5 years after the TL320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 grades versus the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-100 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-100
| TL320 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL320
| EX-100 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 provides physical dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 compared to the TL320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and TL320 is 83 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and TL320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The EX-100 uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The fresher EX-100 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $572 | $380 |