Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very close but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-100 was announced 2 years later than the WB150F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up against the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-100 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-100
| WB150F | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-100 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 has outer dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 vs the WB150F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and WB150F is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and WB150F.
All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB150F will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $572 | $230 |