Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-100 was manufactured 14 months later than the WB30F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-100 grades vs the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-100 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-100
WB30F | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB30F
EX-100 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 features exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-100 against the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/452b1/452b1737771363d8306beb8ac74dd977f469463c" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and WB30F is 83 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fd33/6fd33739be9faacefae80d9a0856dd88445ac6f1" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB30F will offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer EX-100 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5608f/5608f52feab0fa99bf07d67e6301f998b375a017" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56f8f/56f8f44210d89a75b6d2e53791f7976260f099a5" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB30F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $572 | $180 |