Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-100 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was announced 14 months after the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 matches up against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-100
| WB800F | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has got physical dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-100 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-100 compared to the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and WB800F is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB800F will produce greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer EX-100 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $300 |