Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced March 2004
- Replaced the Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-100 versus Sigma SD10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SD10 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-100 was released 10 years after the SD10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up against the SD10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-100 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | March 2004 | More modern by 121 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.7") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 130k | Clearer screen (+792k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-100
| SD10 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Sigma SD10
| EX-100 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 offers exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 versus Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-100 vs the SD10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and SD10 is 83 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and SD10.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-100 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sigma SD10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 950g (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $572 | $198 |