Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly close but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and A390 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-100 was introduced 3 years later than the A390 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-100 matches up vs the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Sony A390
| EX-100 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | July 2010 | More recent by 43 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Casio EX-100
| A390 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Sony A390
| EX-100 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 offers outside dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the A390.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and A390 is 83 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The visual underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and A390.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A390 will result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-02-06 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | 230 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $572 | $500 |