Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Casio EX-Z35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact and both are produced by Casio. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC100 was introduced 13 months prior to the EX-Z35 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-FC100 scores against the EX-Z35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-FC100 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-FC100
EX-Z35 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Casio EX-Z35
EX-FC100 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC100 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC100 versus Casio EX-Z35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC100 compared to the EX-Z35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and EX-Z35 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The photograph here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and EX-Z35.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-Z35 to show extra detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 lb) | 124g (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $99 |