Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and C135 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FC100 was manufactured 4 years prior to the C135 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-FC100 scores vs the C135 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Kodak C135
| EX-FC100 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-FC100
| C135 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Kodak C135
| EX-FC100 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 features external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC100 versus Kodak C135 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the C135.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and C135 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and C135.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak C135 to give greater detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC100 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 175 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $0 |