Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Nikon S9900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC100 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the S9900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-FC100 grades against the S9900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Nikon S9900
| EX-FC100 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-FC100
| S9900 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 | January 2009 | More modern by 74 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Nikon S9900
| EX-FC100 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9900 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Nikon S9900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC100 compared to the S9900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and S9900 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and S9900.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S9900 to provide greater detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $300 |