Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-FC100 was manufactured 4 years prior to the TG-320 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-FC100 scores vs the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus TG-320
EX-FC100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-FC100
TG-320 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus TG-320
EX-FC100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FC100 vs the TG-320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The picture underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to produce more detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $0 |