Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC100 was released 3 years prior to the VR-320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FC100 matches up against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-FC100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-FC100
| VR-320 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 30 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-FC100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 offers external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC100 against the VR-320.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and VR-320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $179 |