Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FC100 was introduced 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FC100 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-FC100
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC100 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $450 |