Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FC100 was introduced 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FC100 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-FC100
XZ-2 iHS | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC100 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $450 |