Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FC100 was introduced 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FC100 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-FC100
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-FC100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC100 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $450 |