Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and G900 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC100 was brought out 10 years prior to the G900 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-FC100 matches up vs the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-FC100 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-FC100
| G900 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 111 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh G900
| EX-FC100 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 comes with exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FC100 vs the G900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and G900.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh G900 to offer you more detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh G900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $752 |