Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-FC100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

The EX-FC100 was announced 10 months earlier than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-FC100 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FC100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-FC100
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FC100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 has got outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC100 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 94 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer you extra detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $566 |