Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC100 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-FC100 grades against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FC100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-FC100
| WG-M1 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FC100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC100 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide extra detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $2,000 |