Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25853/2585360c9fb57f9efdaa2748c02226f007cd526b" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Announced September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FC100 was manufactured 2 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FC100 matches up versus the GX-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung GX-10
EX-FC100 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 28 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-FC100
GX-10 | EX-FC100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung GX-10
EX-FC100 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FC100 and the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7e99/f7e99ebcc1761298c826b02883e1132e4eb44ffc" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and GX-10 is 94 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/703ea/703eab83c326d9a4e698df1f23d9cf9be65ceedc" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and GX-10.
Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung GX-10 will render more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-FC100 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29369/29369cf6604813f86eb4ceb0114cbd74f35f5ae2" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7882e/7882e7262a127630cca9dfcd4ebde3e6ca85714a" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Max aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 793 gr (1.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $850 |