Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC100 was introduced 17 months before the HZ35W making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-FC100 scores versus the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FC100 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-FC100
| HZ35W | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FC100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung HZ35W to provide greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $300 |