Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FC100 was introduced at a similar time to the SL102 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC100 scores versus the SL102 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-FC100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-FC100
| SL102 | EX-FC100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung SL102
| EX-FC100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 comes with outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FC100 compared to the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and SL102.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung SL102 to deliver greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $130 |