Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FC100 was manufactured within a month of the SL202 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FC100 grades against the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-FC100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-FC100
| SL202 | EX-FC100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung SL202
| EX-FC100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC100 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the SL202.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and SL202 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and SL202.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung SL202 to render more detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $140 |
