Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and ST100 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FC100 was introduced 12 months earlier than the ST100 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-FC100 grades versus the ST100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung ST100
EX-FC100 | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-FC100
ST100 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung ST100
EX-FC100 | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC100 comes with outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST100 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 vs the ST100.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and ST100 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The visual below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and ST100.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST100 to result in extra detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung ST100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung ST100 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $250 |