Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung TL205, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and TL205 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FC100 was brought out 12 months earlier than the TL205 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-FC100 grades vs the TL205 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung TL205
| EX-FC100 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-FC100
| TL205 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung TL205
| EX-FC100 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung TL205 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 against the TL205.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and TL205 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and TL205.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung TL205 to provide more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also called | - | PL100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 177g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $180 |
