Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and TL240 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FC100 was unveiled 12 months prior to the TL240 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-FC100 grades vs the TL240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung TL240
| EX-FC100 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-FC100
| TL240 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung TL240
| EX-FC100 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC100 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-FC100 vs the TL240.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and TL240 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and TL240.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung TL240 to produce extra detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $171 |