Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
54
Imaging
61
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Launched January 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1X was introduced 7 years after the VR-340 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M1X scores versus the VR-340 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus VR-340

 E-M1X VR-340 
LaunchedJanuary 2019January 2012Newer by 86 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-M1X

 VR-340 E-M1X 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus VR-340

 E-M1X VR-340 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1X has got exterior dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X versus the VR-340.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and VR-340 is 54 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and VR-340.

As you can see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography details
76
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Street photography highlights
67
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports focus by touch
environment proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than others (997 grams)
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography factors
80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery power (870 CIPA)
supports phase detect autofocus
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1X
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
68
great battery power (870 shots)
environment proofing
supports bluetooth
supports focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
heavier than others (997g)
69
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography highlights
79
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
great battery power (870 per charge)
has dual storage slots
43
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1X
Vlogging with Olympus VR-340
68
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with mic jack
heavier than others (997 grams)
33
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XOlympus VR-340
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1X Olympus VR-340
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2019-01-24 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 997g (2.20 pounds) 125g (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 images -
Battery style Built-in -
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Dual Single
Price at launch $2,999 $130