Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
![Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC100/Casio-EX-FC100-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL320 front Samsung TL320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-TL320.jpg)
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FC100 was revealed within a month of the TL320 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC100 grades versus the TL320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung TL320
EX-FC100 | TL320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-FC100
TL320 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung TL320
EX-FC100 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 and the TL320.
![Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC100-vs-Samsung-TL320-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and TL320 is 94 and 98 respectively.
![Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC100-vs-Samsung-TL320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and TL320.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung TL320 to produce greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
![Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC100-vs-Samsung-TL320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC100-vs-Samsung-TL320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $300 | $380 |