Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC100 was revealed 4 years prior to the WB150F and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-FC100 matches up versus the WB150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-FC100 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-FC100
| WB150F | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-FC100 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC100 compared to the WB150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and WB150F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB150F to offer you greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $230 |