Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25853/2585360c9fb57f9efdaa2748c02226f007cd526b" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f8c8/6f8c814a576e69cce860c8dcb4236d1e91ce58db" alt="Samsung WB210 front Samsung WB210 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-FC100 was revealed 3 years earlier than the WB210 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FC100 grades vs the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung WB210
EX-FC100 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 1k | Crisper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-FC100
WB210 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung WB210
EX-FC100 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC100 and the WB210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50ca0/50ca0c587ea9127324538d6399aad884dfbc82ed" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd8d/3dd8dfe0272769e7218ebf6eb83f4f5749877405" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The visual below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB210 to provide more detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/058d5/058d5873d5c3ecc6c3fc57bfbec3fd0b6f8b127c" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17b6b/17b6b5e056dc9045a875e4e89f891958591bbddb" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB210 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $279 |