Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony A300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the A300 (10MP) is very well matched but the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC100 was manufactured 12 months later than the A300 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC100 matches up against the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Sony A300
| EX-FC100 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 | January 2008 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Casio EX-FC100
| A300 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony A300
| EX-FC100 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony A300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FC100 against the A300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and A300.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FC100 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony A300 will give greater detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher EX-FC100 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 632g (1.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |