Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Key Specs
Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are offered by Casio. The resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the EX-H10 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC150 was announced 6 months after the EX-H10 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-FC150 matches up vs the EX-H10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Casio Exilim EX-H10. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Casio EX-H10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-FC150 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-FC150
| EX-H10 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Casio EX-H10
| EX-FC150 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2009 |  | June 2009 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 enjoys physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Casio EX-H10 has sizing of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the EX-H10.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and EX-H10 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and EX-H10.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-H10 to show extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography details
Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography details
focusing manually
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 as a Street photography camera
Casio EX-H10 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Sports photography details
Casio EX-H10 Sports photography details
fast shooting (40.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-FC150
Travel photography with Casio EX-H10
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography information
Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
no manual exposure
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging highlights
Casio EX-H10 Vlogging highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC150 vs Casio EX-H10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Casio Exilim EX-H10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2009-06-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $300 |
